4.7 Article

Upper Limits on the Rapid Cooling of the Central Compact Object in Cas A

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 864, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad7fc

Keywords

stars: neutron; supernovae: individual (Cassiopeia A); X-rays: stars

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [G05-16068, AR6-17008]
  2. National Aeronautics Space Administration [NAS8-03060]
  3. ACIS Instrument Team [SV4-74018]
  4. NASA [NAS8-03060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Central Compact Object (CCO) in the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant is most likely a very young (approximate to 300 years) neutron star. If a previously reported decrease of its surface temperature by 4% in 10 years could be confirmed, it would have profound theoretical implications for neutron-star physics. However, the temperature decrease was inferred from Chandra ACIS data affected by instrumental effects that could cause time-dependent spectral distortions. Employing a different instrument setup that minimizes spectral distortions, our 2006 and 2012 Chandra spectra of the CCO did not show a statistically significant temperature decrease. Here, we present additional observations from 2015 taken in the same instrument mode. During the time span of 8.5 years, we detect no significant temperature decrease, using either carbon or hydrogen atmosphere models in the X-ray spectral fits. Our conservative 3 sigma upper limits correspond to <3.3% and <2.4% temperature decreases in 10 years for carbon atmosphere model fits with varying or constant values of the absorbing hydrogen column density, respectively. The recently revised model for the ACIS filter contaminant has a strong effect on the fit results, reducing the significance of the previously reported temperature and flux changes. We expect that a further improved contaminant model and longer time coverage can significantly lower the upper limits in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available