4.7 Article

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.042005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation
  3. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  5. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  6. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  7. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  8. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  9. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  10. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  11. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  12. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  13. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  14. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  15. Argonne National Laboratory
  16. University of California at Santa Cruz
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  19. University of Chicago
  20. University College London
  21. DES-Brazil Consortium
  22. University of Edinburgh
  23. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  24. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  25. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  26. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  27. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  28. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  29. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  30. Excellence Cluster Universe
  31. University of Michigan
  32. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  33. University of Nottingham
  34. Ohio State University
  35. University of Pennsylvania
  36. University of Portsmouth
  37. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University
  38. University of Sussex
  39. Texas AM University
  40. OzDES Membership Consortium
  41. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  42. MINECO [AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-88861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2012-0234, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  43. European Union
  44. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  45. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7) [240672, 291329, 306478]
  46. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  48. NASA through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship - Chandra X-ray Center [PF5-160138]
  49. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  50. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  51. STFC [ST/R000972/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/J005428/1, ST/M007030/1, ST/F002335/1, ST/I001204/1, ST/N000668/1, ST/K006797/1, ST/M002853/1, ST/L005573/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection of 660,000 red galaxies with high-precision photometric redshifts, known as redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range 0.15 < z < 0.9. We use two different source samples, obtained from the METACALIBRATION (26 million galaxies) and IM3SHAPE (18 million galaxies) shear estimation codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range 0.2 < z < 1.3. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation, photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of log-normal simulations. We use the shear-ratio geometric test to obtain independent constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing validation of those obtained from other photo-z studies with the same data. We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore showing the galaxymatter cross-correlation coefficient r to be consistent with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The results in this work present one of the three two-point correlation functions, along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available