4.7 Article

Mechanism of charge transfer and its impacts on Fermi-level pinning for gas molecules adsorbed on monolayer WS2

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 142, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2011J05006, 2009J05149]
  2. Department of Education of Fujian Province [JA09146]
  3. Huang Hui Zhen Foundation of Jimei University [ZC2010014]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Jimei University [ZQ2011008, ZQ2009004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory calculations were performed to assess changes in the geometric and electronic structures of monolayer WS2 upon adsorption of various gas molecules (H-2, O-2, H2O, NH3, NO, NO2, and CO). The most stable configuration of the adsorbed molecules, the adsorption energy, and the degree of charge transfer between adsorbate and substrate were determined. All evaluated molecules were physisorbed on monolayer WS2 with a low degree of charge transfer and accept charge from the monolayer, except for NH3, which is a charge donor. Band structure calculations showed that the valence and conduction bands of monolayer WS2 are not significantly altered upon adsorption of H-2, H2O, NH3, and CO, whereas the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals of O-2, NO, and NO2 are pinned around the Fermi-level when these molecules are adsorbed on monolayer WS2. The phenomenon of Fermi-level pinning was discussed in light of the traditional and orbital mixing charge transfer theories. The impacts of the charge transfer mechanism on Fermi-level pinning were confirmed for the gas molecules adsorbed on monolayer WS2. The proposed mechanism governing Fermi-level pinning is applicable to the systems of adsorbates on recently developed two-dimensional materials, such as graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available