4.7 Article

Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.072001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF-2009-0083526]
  5. European Union [RISE-GA641540-SKPLUS]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  7. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11235006]
  8. National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  9. Scinet and Westgrid consortia of Compute Canada
  10. National Science Centre of Poland [2015/17/N/ST2/04064, 2015/18/E/ST2/00758]
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25105004] Funding Source: KAKEN
  12. STFC [ST/N000277/1, ST/R000069/1, ST/S001174/1, Hyper-K, ST/G003440/1, ST/N000447/1, ST/N000242/1, T2K, 1643404, ST/H003517/1, ST/H000747/1, ST/M00290X/1, ST/N000420/1, ST/R00031X/1, ST/M002691/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An analysis of atmospheric neutrino data from all four run periods of Super-Kamiokande optimized for sensitivity to the neutrino mass hierarchy is presented. Confidence intervals for Delta m(3)(2)(2), sin(2) theta(23), sin(2) theta(13) and (delta(cp) are presented for normal neutrino mass hierarchy and inverted neutrino mass hierarchy hypotheses, based on atmospheric neutrino data alone. Additional constraints from reactor data on theta(1)(3) and from published binned T2K data on muon neutrino disappearance and electron neutrino appearance are added to the atmospheric neutrino fit to give enhanced constraints on the above parameters. Over the range of parameters allowed at 90% confidence level, the normal mass hierarchy is favored by between 91.9% and 94.5% based on the combined Super-Kamiokande plus T2K result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available