4.7 Article

Does the Compact Radio Jet in PG 1700+518 Drive a Molecular Outflow?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 852, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9934

Keywords

galaxies: active; quasars: individual (PG 1700+518); radio lines: galaxies

Funding

  1. J. Lester Crain Chair of Physics at Rhodes College
  2. Distinguished Visitor grant from the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics at Australian National University
  3. INSU/CNRS (France)
  4. MPG (Germany)
  5. IGN (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radio jets play an important role in quasar feedback, but direct observations showing how the jets interact with the multi-phase interstellar medium of galaxy disks are few and far between. In this work, we provide new millimeter interferometric observations of PG 1700+518 in order to investigate the effect of its radio jet on the surrounding molecular gas. PG 1700 is a radio-quiet, low-ionization broad absorption line quasar whose host galaxy has a nearby interacting companion. On subkiloparsec scales, the ionized gas is driven to high velocities by a compact radio jet that is identified by radio interferometry. We present observations from the NOrthern Extended Millimeter Array (NOEMA) interferometer with a 3 ''.8 (16 kpc) synthesized beam where we detect the CO(1 -> 0) emission line at 30 sigma significance with a total flux of 3.12 +/- 0.02 Jy km s(-1) and a typical velocity dispersion of 125 +/- 5 km s(-1). Despite the outflow in ionized gas, we find no concrete evidence that the CO gas is being affected by the radio jet on size scales of a kiloparsec or more. However, a similar to 1 '' drift in the spatial centroid of the CO emission as a function of velocity across the emission line and the compact nature of the jet hint that higher spatial resolution observations may reveal a signal of interaction between the jet and molecular gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available