4.6 Article

ETFE-based anion-exchange membrane ionomer powders for alkaline membrane fuel cells: a first performance comparison of head-group chemistry

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 6, Issue 47, Pages 24330-24341

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta08309f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M014371/1, EP/M022749/1, EP/M005933/1]
  2. FAPESP [2016/13277-9, 2015/09210-3, 2015/23621-6, 2014/09087-4, 2014/50279-4]
  3. PDIF Short Stay Scholarship of the Autonomous University of Madrid
  4. ERASMUS+ work placement scheme
  5. EPSRC [EP/M022749/1, EP/M014371/1, EP/M005933/1, EP/L02263X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last few years, the development of radiation-grafted powder-form anion-exchange ionomers (AEI), used in combination with anion-exchange membranes (AEM), has led to the assembly of AEM-based fuel cells (AEMFC) that routinely yield power densities ranging between 1-2 W cm(-2) (with a variety of catalysts). However, to date, only benzyltrimethylammonium-type powder AEIs have been evaluated in AEMFCs. This study presents an initial evaluation of the relative AEMFC power outputs when using a combination of ETFE-based radiation-grafted AEMs and AEIs containing three different head-group chemistries: benzyltrimethylammonium (TMA), benzyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium (MPY), and benzyl-N-methylpiperidinium (MPRD). The results from this study strongly suggest that future research should focus on the development and operando long-term durability testing of AEMs and AEIs containing the MPRD head-group chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available