4.6 Article

Graphene/ionic liquid ultracapacitors: does ionic size correlate with energy storage performance?

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 42, Issue 22, Pages 18409-18417

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nj04399j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2017/11631-2]
  2. Shell
  3. ANP (Brazil's National Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency) through the R&D levy regulation
  4. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An electric double layer ultracapacitor stores energy in an electric double layer formed near its electrolyte/electrode interfaces. Graphene-based ultracapacitors, because of their outstanding performance, have attracted significant research interest. Optimization of ultracapacitor performance requires understanding the correlation of molecular characteristic of the device (such as structure and inter-ionic and ion-electrode interactions) with its macroscopic properties. Herein, we report a molecular dynamics study of how the ionic volume impacts the double-layer capacitance. Four systems were probed: large cation + large anion, large cation + small anion, small cation + large anion; small cation + small anion. Our results show that the structuring of the ionic liquid is driven by the electrolyte-electrode interactions in the ultracapacitor, which are predominantly of the van der Waals type. Storage energy densities are similar for all ultracapacitors, being in the range of 24 to 28 J cm(-3) at 5.0 V. Our results present a comparative analysis of the performances of four different ILs confined between two graphene electrodes. Although the best performance has been observed for the IL with ions (cations and anions) of equal sizes, no definite conclusion about the correlation of the performance to the ionic size ratio can be made from the present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available