4.5 Article

The Effect of the Endothelial Cell Cortex on Atomic Force Microscopy Measurements

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 300-309

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.034

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Glaucoma Research program of the Bright Focus Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 EY 01969, T32 EY007128]
  3. Massachusetts Lions Eye Research Fund, Inc.
  4. National Science Foundation-Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center
  5. National Science Foundation-Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers
  6. Keck Foundation
  7. State of Illinois
  8. Northwestern University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined whether the presence of the cell cortex might explain, in part, why previous studies using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure cell modulus (E) gave higher values with sharp tips than for larger spherical tips. We confirmed these AFM findings in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and Schlemm's canal (SC) endothelial cells with AFM indentation <= 400 nm, two cell types with prominent cortices (312 +/- 65 nm in HUVEC and 371 +/- 91 nm in SC cells). With spherical tips, E (kPa) was 0.71 +/- 0.16 in HUVEC and 0.94 +/- 0.06 in SC cells. Much higher values of E were measured using sharp tips: 3.23 +/- 0.54 in HUVEC and 6.67 +/- 1.07 in SC cells. Previous explanations for this difference such as strain hardening or a substrate effect were shown to be inconsistent with our measurements. Finite element modeling studies showed that a stiff cell cortex could explain the results. In both cell types, Latrunculin-A greatly reduced E for sharp and rounded tips, and also reduced the ratio of the values measured with a sharp tip as compared to a rounded tip. Our results suggest that the cell cortex increases the apparent endothelial cell modulus considerably when measured using a sharp AFM tip.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available