4.6 Article

Mechanism Explaining the Onset Time of Dendritic Lithium Electrodeposition via Considerations of the Li+ Transport within the Solid Electrolyte Interphase

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 165, Issue 14, Pages D696-D703

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0601814jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ohio Federal Research Network (OFRN) through the Center of Excellence on 'Partnership for Research in Energy Storage and Integration for Defense and Space Exploration (PRESIDES)'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical hurdle in realizing rechargeable lithium-metal batteries is the dendritic electrodeposition of lithium during the battery charging process. Here, we investigate the onset of dendritic morphology during galvanostatic lithium electrodeposition using electrochemical techniques combined with optical microscopy. We show that lithium dendrites initiate at the time when the surface overpotential during galvanostatic electrodeposition reaches a maximum value. This observation is explained using an analytical transport model wherein the Li+ concentration within the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) near the lithium metal surface decreases gradually as the SEI thickness and its transport resistance increases with time. At the dendrite onset time (tau(onset)), the Li+ concentration at the lithium-SEI interface approaches zero - a condition under which surface roughness on the lithium electrode amplifies, producing dendrites. Once dendrites form, they rupture the SEI, lowering the surface resistance for plating. Model predictions of how t onset varies with current density and soak time are shown to be in qualitative agreement with experimental observations. Furthermore, pulsed currents are applied to mitigate Li+ concentration depletion within the SEI, thereby delaying or preventing altogether the formation of lithium dendrites. (C) The Author(s) 2018. Published by ECS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available