4.7 Article

Absolute NMR shielding scales and nuclear spin-rotation constants in 175LuX and 197AuX (X=19F, 35Cl, 79Br and 127I)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 143, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4934533

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway through a Centre of Excellence Grant [179568/V30, 214095, 177558]
  2. European Research Council [279619]
  3. Norwegian Supercomputing program NOTUR [NN4654K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present nuclear spin-rotation constants, absolute nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shielding constants, and shielding spans of all the nuclei in (LuX)-Lu-175 and (AuX)-Au-197 (X = F-19, Cl-35, Br-79, I-127), calculated using coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles with a perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) correction theory, four-component relativistic density functional theory (relativistic DFT), and non-relativistic DFT. The total nuclear spin-rotation constants determined by adding the relativistic corrections obtained from DFT calculations to the CCSD(T) values are in general in agreement with available experimental data, indicating that the computational approach followed in this study allows us to predict reliable results for the unknown spin-rotation constants in these molecules. The total NMR absolute shielding constants are determined for all the nuclei following the same approach as that applied for the nuclear spin-rotation constants. In most of the molecules, relativistic effects significantly change the computed shielding constants, demonstrating that straightforward application of the non-relativistic formula relating the electronic contribution to the nuclear spin-rotation constants and the paramagnetic contribution to the shielding constants does not yield correct results. We also analyze the origin of the unusually large absolute shielding constant and its relativistic correction of gold in AuF compared to the other gold monohalides. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available