4.5 Article

Salt Contribution to RNA Tertiary Structure Folding Stability

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 176-187

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.050

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB0920067, MCB0920411]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM063732]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [10844007, 11074191]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents [NCET 08-0408]
  5. Chutian Scholar Program of Hubei Province
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0920067] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate quantification of the ionic contribution to RNA folding stability could greatly enhance our ability to understand and predict RNA functions. Recently, motivated by the potential importance of ion correlation and fluctuation in RNA folding, we developed the tightly bound ion (TBI) model. Extensive experimental tests showed that the TBI model can lead to better treatment of multivalent ions than the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. In this study, we use the model to quantify the contribution of salt (Na+ and Mg2+) to the RNA tertiary structure folding free energy. Folding of the RNA tertiary structure often involves intermediates. We focus on the folding transition from an intermediate state to the native state, and compute the electrostatic folding free energy of the RNA. Based on systematic calculations for a variety of RNA molecules, we derive a set of formulas for the electrostatic free energy for tertiary structural folding as a function of the sequence length and compactness of the RNA and the Na+ and Mg2+ concentrations. Extensive comparisons with experimental data suggest that our model and the extracted empirical formulas are quite reliable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available