4.5 Article

A Model of the Interaction between N-type and C-type Inactivation in Kv1.4 Channels

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 11-21

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01HL062465, 5R01HL062465-S1]
  2. Oishei Foundation
  3. American Heart Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kv1.4 channels are Shaker-related voltage-gated potassium channels with two distinct inactivation mechanisms. Fast N-type inactivation operates by a ball-and-chain mechanism. Slower C-type inactivation is not so well defined, but involves intracellular and extracellular conformational changes of the channel. We studied the interaction between inactivation mechanisms using two-electrode voltage-clamp of Kv1.4 and Kv1.4 Delta N (amino acids 2-146 deleted to remove N-type inactivation) heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes. We manipulated C-type inactivation by introducing a lysine-tyrosine point mutation (K532Y, equivalent to Shaker T449Y) that diminishes C-type inactivation. We used experimental data to develop a comprehensive computer model of Kv1.4 channels to determine the interaction between activation and N- and C-type inactivation mechanisms needed to replicate the experimental data. C-type inactivation began at lower voltage preactivated states, whereas N-type inactivation was coupled directly to the open state. A model with distinct N- and C-type inactivated states was not able to reproduce experimental data, and direct transitions between N- and C-type inactivated states were required, i.e., there is coupling between N- and C-type inactivated states. C-type inactivation is the rate-limiting step determining recovery from inactivation, so understanding C-type inactivation, and how it is coupled to N-type inactivation, is critical in understanding how channels act to repetitive stimulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available