4.6 Article

Socioeconomic Status and the Gut Microbiome: A TwinsUK Cohort Study

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7010017

Keywords

microbiome; microbiota; sociobiome; socioeconomic status; SES

Categories

Funding

  1. Chronic Disease Research Foundation (Denise Coates Foundation)
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT081878MA]
  3. U.S. National Institutes of Health [R21 AI21784-01]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. European Union
  7. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  8. King's College London
  9. MRC [MR/N01183X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R21AI121784] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Socioeconomic inequalities in health and mortality are well established, but the biological mechanisms underlying these associations are less understood. In parallel, the gut microbiome is emerging as a potentially important determinant of human health, but little is known about its broader environmental and social determinants. We test the association between gut microbiota composition and individual- and area-level socioeconomic factors in a well-characterized twin cohort. In this study, 1672 healthy volunteers from twin registry TwinsUK had data available for at least one socioeconomic measure, existing fecal 16S rRNA microbiota data, and all considered co-variables. Associations with socioeconomic status (SES) were robust to adjustment for known health correlates of the microbiome; conversely, these health-microbiome associations partially attenuated with adjustment for SES. Twins discordant for IMD (Index of Multiple Deprivation) were shown to significantly differ by measures of compositional dissimilarity, with suggestion the greater the difference in twin pair IMD, the greater the dissimilarity of their microbiota. Future research should explore how SES might influence the composition of the gut microbiota and its potential role as a mediator of differences associated with SES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available