4.6 Article

On the Performance of Cell-Free Massive MIMO With Low-Resolution ADCs

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 117968-117977

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937094

Keywords

Cell-free mMIMO; low-resolution ADC; AQNM; spectral efficiency; energy efficiency

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1314903]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61861039, 61372124, 61427801]
  3. Science and Technology Project Foundation of Gansu Province [18YF1GA060]
  4. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJKY19_0740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers an uplink cell-free massive multi-input multi-output (mMIMO) system with multi-antenna access points (APs) and users, assuming low-resolution analog-to-digital converter (ADC) architecture is employed at the APs. Leveraging on the additive quantization noise model (AQNM), we derive a tight approximate expression for uplink spectral efficiency (SE). This trackable finding provides us with a tool for easily quantifying the impacts of the number of antenna arrays and the number of quantization bit of low-resolution ADCs. We find 5-bit is required in a cell-free mMIMO with low-resolution ADCs to achieve the same SE as a cell-free mMIMO with full-precision ADCs. Besides, when the number of antennas of the user is small, deploying more antennas at the users can boost the sum SE. Then, to further highlight the potential of low-resolution ADCs architecture, we also investigate the tradeoff between the SE and energy efficiency (EE) with design issues surrounding the quantization bit of low-resolution ADCs and the number of antenna arrays. The resulting observations reveal that by choosing a proper quantization bit, the cell-free mMIMO with low-resolution ADCs has the capability to enjoy a better SE-EE tradeoff compared to the perfect ADCs counterpart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available