4.7 Article

Safe and green Li-ion batteries based on LiFePO4 and Li4Ti5O12 sprayed as aqueous slurries with xanthan gum as common binder

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 168-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2019.01.008

Keywords

Li-ion battery; Electrode processing; Xanthan gum; Spray-coating; Current collector recycling

Funding

  1. BATWAL project (Region Wallonne) [1318146]
  2. University of Liege (Fonds Speciaux pour la Recherche) [FSR C13/09]
  3. Fonds de Bay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-ion batteries based on LiFePO4 positive electrodes and Li4Ti5O12 negative electrodes, both processed via an aqueous slurry preparation pathway, are presented. In this respect, xanthan gum, a cheap and water-soluble polysaccharide, is shown to be a suitable binder for both electrodes, allowing for a simplified and common preparation method. The electrodes, obtained by spray-coating, show an improved adhesion to the current collectors. The performance of the water-processed electrodes have been investigated in half-cells and compared to similar electrodes prepared upon using PVDF as a binder and N-methyl-pyrrolidone as a solvent. Electrochemical characterizations point to similar performance in terms of (dis-)charge capacities and a good cycling stability. Full-cells based on the obtained electrodes also show stable cycling, with a capacity of similar to 110 mA h/g at C/2. The procedure was further extended to the use of stainless-steel as current collectors, with similar results in terms of electrochemical behavior. A relationship was established between the (dis-)charge capacity and the loading of active material for both the positive and negative electrodes, demonstrating the need to take this parameter into account when comparing data in terms of performance of the cells. Finally, the spent electrode substrates can easily be recycled upon immersion in water. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available