4.8 Review

The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making

Journal

NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 20-23

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-018-0004-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UT-Battelle, LLC [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medicine, even from the earliest days of artificial intelligence (AI) research, has been one of the most inspiring and promising domains for the application of AI-based approaches. Equally, it has been one of the more challenging areas to see an effective adoption. There are many reasons for this, primarily the reluctance to delegate decision making to machine intelligence in cases where patient safety is at stake. To address some of these challenges, medical AI, especially in its modern data-rich deep learning guise, needs to develop a principled and formal uncertainty quantification (UQ) discipline, just as we have seen in fields such as nuclear stockpile stewardship and risk management. The data-rich world of AI-based learning and the frequent absence of a well-understood underlying theory poses its own unique challenges to straightforward adoption of UQ. These challenges, while not trivial, also present significant new research opportunities for the development of new theoretical approaches, and for the practical applications of UQ in the area of machine-assisted medical decision making. Understanding prediction system structure and defensibly quantifying uncertainty is possible, and, if done, can significantly benefit both research and practical applications of AI in this critical domain. Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. It is time to develop methods for systematically quantifying uncertainty underlying deep learning processes, which would lead to increased confidence in practical applicability of these approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available