3.8 Article

Virtual screening of novel compounds as potential ER alpha inhibitors

Journal

BIOINFORMATION
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 321-332

Publisher

BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
DOI: 10.6026/97320630015321

Keywords

molecular docking; virtual screening; ER alpha; estrogen; bipyrazoles; drug Bank

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Majority of breast cancers diagnosed today are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, however, progesterone receptor-positive (PR-positive) is also responsible for breast cancer. Tumors that are ER/PR-positive are much more likely to respond to hormone therapy than tumors that are ER/PR-negative. Nearly 105 ER alpha inhibitors from literature when docked resulted in 31 compounds (pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine analogs and chromen-2-one derivatives) with better binding affinities. The maximum score obtained was -175.282 kcal/mol for compound, [2-(4-Fluoro-phenylamino)-pyridin-3-yl]-{4-[2-phenyl-7- (3, 4, 5-trimethoxy-phenyl)-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-5-carbonyl]-piperazin-1-yl}-methanone. The major H-bond interactions are observed with Thr347. In pursuit to identify novel ER alpha inhibitory ligands, virtual screening was carried out by docking pyrazole, bipyrazole, thiazole, thiadiazole etc scaffold analogs from literature.34 bipyrazoles from literature revealed Compound 2, ethyl 5-amino-1-(5-amino-3-anilino-4-ethoxycarbonyl-pyrazol-1-yl)-3-anilino-pyrazole-4-carboxylate, with -175.9 kcal/mol binding affinity with the receptor, where a favourable H-bond was formed with Thr347.On the other hand, screening 2035 FDA approved drugs from Drug Bank database resulted in 11 drugs which showed better binding affinities than ER alpha bound tamoxifen. Consensus scoring using 5 scoring schemes such as Mol Dock score, mcule, SwissDock, Pose&Rank and DSX respectively resulted in better rank-sumsfor Lomitapide, Itraconazole, Cobicistat, Azilsartanmedoxomil, and Zafirlukast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available