4.5 Article

A Quantitative Approach to Analyze Binding Diffusion Kinetics by Confocal FRAP

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages 2737-2747

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM073846, RO1 GM068953]
  2. American Cancer Society [IRG-S8-009-48]
  3. Sartain-Lanier Family foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most of the important types of interactions that occur in cells can be characterized as binding-diffusion type processes, and can be quantified by kinetic rate constants such as diffusion coefficients (D) and binding rate constants (k(on) and k(off)). Confocal FRAP is a potentially important tool for the quantitative analysis of intracellular binding-diffusion kinetics, but how to dependably extract accurate kinetic constants from such analyses is still an open question. To this end, in this study, we developed what we believe is a new analytical model for confocal FRAP-based measurements of intracellular binding-diffusion processes, based on a closed-form equation of the FRAP formula for a spot photobleach geometry. This approach incorporates a binding diffusion model that allows for diffusion of both the unbound and bound species, and also compensates for binding diffusion that occurs during photobleaching, a critical consideration in confocal FRAP analysis. In addition, to address the problem of parametric multiplicity, we propose a scheme to reduce the number of fitting parameters in the effective diffusion subregime when D's for the bound and unbound species are known. We validate this method by measuring kinetic rate constants for the CAAX-mediated binding of Ras to membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum, obtaining binding constants of k(on) similar to 255/s and k(off) similar to 31/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available