4.2 Article

Computational efficiency of numerical integration methods for the tangent dynamics of many-body Hamiltonian systems in one and two spatial dimensions

Journal

MATHEMATICS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 447-488

Publisher

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/mine.2019.3.447

Keywords

classical many-body systems; variational equations; ordinary differential equations; symplectic integrators; Lyapunov exponent; computational efficiency; optimization

Funding

  1. IBS [IBS-R024-D1]
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the computational performance of various numerical methods for the integration of the equations of motion and the variational equations for some typical classical many-body models of condensed matter physics: the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou (FPUT) chain and the one- and two-dimensional disordered, discrete nonlinear Schrodinger equations (DDNLS). In our analysis we consider methods based on Taylor series expansion, Runge-Kutta discretization and symplectic transformations. The latter have the ability to exactly preserve the symplectic structure of Hamiltonian systems, which results in keeping bounded the error of the system's computed total energy. We perform extensive numerical simulations for several initial conditions of the studied models and compare the numerical efficiency of the used integrators by testing their ability to accurately reproduce characteristics of the systems' dynamics and quantify their chaoticity through the computation of the maximum Lyapunov exponent. We also report the expressions of the implemented symplectic schemes and provide the explicit forms of the used differential operators. Among the tested numerical schemes the symplectic integrators ABA864 and SRKN14a exhibit the best performance, respectively for moderate and high accuracy levels in the case of the FPUT chain, while for the DDNLS models s9ABC6 and s11ABC6 (moderate accuracy), along with s17ABC8 and s19ABC8 (high accuracy) proved to be the most efficient schemes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available