4.2 Article

Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) of large amphibian genomes: a comparative study of two non-model species endemic to Italy

Journal

ANIMAL BIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 307-326

Publisher

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/15707563-00001094

Keywords

Conservation genomics; frog; newt; Next Generation Sequencing; SNPs; whole genome duplications

Categories

Funding

  1. European Science Foundation (ESF)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Environment [206/2010]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy [CGL2013-40924-P]
  4. Dept. of Education Universities and Research of the Basque Government [DKR-2012-64]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and related technologies have revolutionized the field of conservation and population genetics, providing novel tools and the capacity to discover thousands of new Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) for the analysis of population parameters. However, gathering NGS data for organisms with very large genomes, such as amphibians, remains challenging because it is still unclear how the current methods perform. Here, we use the Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) approach to generate SNP data for the genotyping of two amphibian species that are of conservation concern, the Sardinian brook salamander (Euproctus platycephalus) and the Italian stream frog (Rana italica). Both E. platycephalus and R. italica have very large genomes (5.53 Gb and >20 Gb, respectively) so genomic data are not available for either of them. We used 95 individual samples and one Illumina lane for each species, with an additional lane for E. platycephalus. After filtering, we obtained 961 and 854 high-coverage SNPs for E. platycephalus and R. italica, respectively. Our results suggest that GBS can serve as a reliable and cost-effective method for genotyping large amphibian genomes, including non-model species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available