4.7 Article

Molecular Docking Screening Using Agonist-Bound GPCR Structures: Probing the A2A Adenosine Receptor

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 550-563

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ci500639g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  2. Center of Biomembrane Research
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  4. Swedish e-Science Research Center
  5. NIDDK Intramural Research Program
  6. Sven och Lilly Lawski Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystal structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have recently revealed the molecular basis of ligand binding and activation, which has provided exciting opportunities for structure-based drug design. The A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)AR) is a promising therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases, but progress in this area is limited by the lack of novel agonist scaffolds. We carried out docking screens of 6.7 million commercially available molecules against active-like conformations of the A(2A)AR to investigate whether these structures could guide the discovery of agonists. Nine out of the 20 predicted agonists were confirmed to be A(2A)AR ligands, but none of these activated the ARs. The difficulties in discovering AR agonists using structure-based methods originated from limited atomic-level understanding of the activation mechanism and a chemical bias toward antagonists in the screened library. In particular, the composition of the screened library was found to strongly reduce the likelihood of identifying AR agonists, which reflected the high ligand complexity required for receptor activation. Extension of this analysis to other pharmaceutically relevant GPCRs suggested that library screening may not be suitable for targets requiring a complex receptor-ligand interaction network. Our results provide specific directions for the future development of novel A(2A)AR agonists and general strategies for structure-based drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available