4.0 Article

Number of metastatic lymph nodes and zones as prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 305-314

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa107

Keywords

Lung cancer; Lymph node dissection; Tumour-node-metastasis staging system

Funding

  1. Fukui Cancer Research Grant from the Osaka Community Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Characterizing pathological nodes (pNs) by location alone is sometimes inadequate as patients with pN1 or pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) show prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to assess the relationship of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and zones with prognosis in NSCLC patients. METHODS: We analysed 1393 patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal LN dissection for NSCLC at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the number of LNs: n1-3, n4-6 and n7-. We investigated the relationship of prognosis with the number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones. RESULTS: In the multivariable analyses, the number of metastatic LNs and zones were not independent factors for overall survival or recurrence-free survival in patients with pN1 disease after adjustment for age, sex, tumour histology and tumour diameter. However, n4-6 (ref. n1-3) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 4.148, P<0.001] in those with pN2 disease. There were no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between pN1 (HR 0.674, P=0.175) and pN2n1-3 disease (HR 1.056, P=0.808). Moreover, patients with pN2 disease with a higher number of metastatic zones had a poor prognosis for recurrence-free survival [3 zones (ref. ): HR 1.774, P=0.051, and 4 zones (ref. ): HR 2.173, P<0.047]. CONCLUSIONS: The number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones were useful prognostic factors in NSCLC patients. The findings could help in establishing a new pN classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available