4.7 Article

Modelling the potential for soil carbon sequestration using biochar from sugarcane residues in Brazil

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76470-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SOILS-R-GGREAT project of the greenhouse gas removal (GGR) program [NE/P019498/1]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  3. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
  4. Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC)
  5. UK department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  6. NERC [NE/P019455/1, 2047037, NE/P019498/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivation leaves behind around 20 t ha(-1) of biomass residue after harvest and processing. We investigated the potential for sequestering carbon (C) in soil with these residues by partially converting them into biochar (recalcitrant carbon-rich material). First, we modified the RothC model to allow changes in soil C arising from additions of sugarcane-derived biochar. Second, we evaluated the modified model against published field data, and found satisfactory agreement between observed and predicted soil C accumulation. Third, we used the model to explore the potential for soil C sequestration with sugarcane biochar in SAo Paulo State, Brazil. The results show a potential increase in soil C stocks by 2.35 +/- 0.4 t C ha(-1) year(-1) in sugarcane fields across the State at application rates of 4.2 t biochar ha(-1) year(-1). Scaling to the total sugarcane area of the State, this would be 50 Mt of CO2 equivalent year(-1), which is 31% of the CO2 equivalent emissions attributed to the State in 2016. Future research should (a) further validate the model with field experiments; (b) make a full life cycle assessment of the potential for greenhouse gas mitigation, including additional effects of biochar applications on greenhouse gas balances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available