4.6 Review

Using Blockchain to Improve Collaborative Business Process Management: Systematic Literature Review

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 142312-142336

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013911

Keywords

Systematics; Collaboration; Business process management; Companies; Computer architecture; Systematic literature review; collaborative business processes; blockchain technology; business process management; inter-organizational process management; BPM

Funding

  1. POLOLAS (Explorando Soluciones Guiadas para Sistematizar el Aseguramiento Temprano de la Calidad del Software) - Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [TIN2016-76956-C3-2-R]
  2. TRoPA (Early Testing in Medical Robotics Process Automation) - Andalusian Regional Ministry of Economy, Knowledge, Business and University [CEI-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BlockChain Technology (BCT) has appeared with strength and promises an authentic revolution on business, management, and organizational strategies related to utilization of advanced software systems. In fact, BCT promotes a decentralized architecture to process management and the collaborative work between entities when these ones are working together in a business process. This paper aims to know what proposals exist to improve any stage of business process management using BCT because this technology could provide benefits in this management. For this purpose, this paper presents a systematic literature review in area of Collaborative Business Processes (CBP) in BCT domain to identify opportunities and gaps for further research. This paper concludes there is a rapid and growing interest of public bodies, scientific community and software industries to know opportunities that BCT offers to improve CBP management in a decentralized manner. However, although the topic is in early stages, there are very promising lines of research and relevant open issues, but there also is lack of scientific rigor in validation process into the different studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available