4.6 Article

Fast Corona Discharge Assessment Using FDM integrated With Full Multigrid Method in HVDC Transmission Lines Considering Wind Impact

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 225872-225883

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045073

Keywords

Corona; HVDC transmission; Mathematical model; Electric fields; Current density; Frequency division multiplexing; Wires; HVDC transmission line; finite difference method; full multigrid method; corona discharge; wind impact

Funding

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel approach for solving the monopolar corona in high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission line systems is proposed by the finite difference method (FDM) and a full multigrid method (FMG). Specifically, the FMG is implemented as a fast solver with respect to existing iterative solutions for the FDM to solve the Poisson equation, particularly on fine grids. The advantage features of the proposed approach are that it avoids the hypothesis of a constant electric field around the conductor's surface. Further, it considers the influence of space charge on both the magnitude and the direction of the electrical field. The proposed approach is employed for computing the electric field and current density on the ground plane with and without wind effect. Considering the impact of wind in the present study, the findings confirm that both corona current density and electric field on the ground plane are influenced by the transverse wave. Eventually, the effect of changing the wind speed on the electric field profiles and the current density is deeply studied in HVDC transmission line systems. To prove the efficacy of the proposed approach, it is compared with previous experimental results where a better agreement is reached rather than other numerical techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available