4.6 Article

Permissioned Blockchain-Based Double-Layer Framework for Product Traceability System

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 6209-6225

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962274

Keywords

Product traceability; permissioned blockchain; double-layer framework; smart contracts; simulation experiment

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1400700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61602537, U1509214]
  3. Science and Technology Development Center of Ministry of Education [2019J02022]
  4. Central University of Finance and Economics Program of the Youth Talent Support Plan [QYP1808]
  5. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Grain Information Processing and Control of Ministry of Education [KFJJ-2018-202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blockchain-based product traceability systems are receiving increasing attention from both industry and academia. Existing systems make full use of the traceability and non-modification characteristics of blockchain technology and realize the openness and transparency of product traceability information in the entire supply chain. However, existing systems do not consider government regulation, cannot protect enterprise sensitive private data effectively, and have performance bottlenecks. To address these problems, this paper proposes a product traceability scheme based on the permissioned blockchain within a double-layer framework. We introduce the double-layer framework and describe its advantages in detail. We also describe the smart contracts (chain code) in the double-layer framework. Finally, we test the performance of the proposed scheme through simulation experiments. The simulation results demonstrate the performance of nodes in the main layer, which is very important for consumers to obtain product traceability information, is optimized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available