4.6 Article

Multi-Sensor Fusion in Automated Driving: A Survey

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 2847-2868

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962554

Keywords

Automated driving; multi-sensor fusion strategy; multi-target tracking; environmental reconstruction; data association; intent analysis; deep learning

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Project of China [61404130113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the significant development of practicability in deep learning and the ultra-high-speed information transmission rate of 5G communication technology will overcome the barrier of data transmission on the Internet of Vehicles, automated driving is becoming a pivotal technology affecting the future industry. Sensors are the key to the perception of the outside world in the automated driving system and whose cooperation performance directly determines the safety of automated driving vehicles. In this survey, we mainly discuss the different strategies of multi-sensor fusion in automated driving in recent years. The performance of conventional sensors and the necessity of multi-sensor fusion are analyzed, including radar, LiDAR, camera, ultrasonic, GPS, IMU, and V2X. According to the differences in the latest studies, we divide the fusion strategies into four categories and point out some shortcomings. Sensor fusion is mainly applied for multi-target tracking and environment reconstruction. We discuss the method of establishing a motion model and data association in multi-target tracking. At the end of the paper, we analyzed the deficiencies in the current studies and put forward some suggestions for further improvement in the future. Through this investigation, we hope to analyze the current situation of multi-sensor fusion in the automated driving process and provide more efficient and reliable fusion strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available