4.5 Article

Electrostatic contribution to the surface pressure of charged monolayers containing polyphosphoinositides

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages 1199-1205

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.126615

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03-TW-006954-01, R03 TW006954] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural and functional studies of lateral heterogeneity in biological membranes have underlined the importance of membrane organization in biological function. Most inquiries have focused on steric determinants of membrane organization, such as headgroup size and acyl-chain saturation. This manuscript reports a combination of theory and experiment that shows significant electrostatic contributions to surface pressures in monolayers of phospholipids where the charge spacing is smaller than the Bjerrum length. For molecules with steric cross sections typical of phospholipids in the cell membrane (similar to 50 angstrom(2)), only polyphosphoinositides achieve this threshold. The most abundant such lipid is phosphaticlylinositol bisphosphate, which has between three and four charged groups at physiological conditions. Theory and experiment show that surface pressure increases linearly with phosphaticlylinositol bisphosphate net charge and reveal crossing of high and low ionic strength pressure-area isotherms, due to opposing effects of ionic strength in compressed and expanded monolayers. Theory and experiment show that electrostatic effects are negligible for monolayers of univalent lipids, emphasizing the unique importance of electrostatic effects for lateral organization of polyphosphoinositides. Quantitative differences between theory and experiment suggest that attractive interactions between polyphosphoinositides, possibly mediated by hydrogen bonding, can lessen the effect of electrostatic repulsions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available