3.8 Article

Creating a Global Community of Practice for Oncofertility

Journal

JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 317-330

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2015.000307

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Reproductive Health After Disease [P50HD076188]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Center for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P50HD076188] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA060553] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fertility preservation in the cancer setting, known as oncofertility, is a field that requires cross-disciplinary interaction between physicians, basic scientists, clinical researchers, ethicists, lawyers, educators, and religious leaders. Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Oncofertility Consortium (OC) was formed to be a scientifically grounded, transparent, and altruistic resource, both intellectual and monetary, for building this new field of practice capable of addressing the unique needs of young patients with cancer. The OC has expanded its attention to include other nonmalignant conditions that can threaten fertility, and the work of the OC now extends around the globe, involving partners who together have created a community of shared effort, resources, and practices. The OC creates materials that are translated, disseminated, and amended by all participants in the field, and local programs of excellence have developed worldwide to accelerate the pace and improve the quality of oncofertility research and practice. Here we review the global oncofertility programs and the capacity building activities that strengthen these research and clinical programs, ultimately improving patient care. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available