4.7 Review

Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 25-39

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41577-019-0218-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  2. US National Institutes of Health [R35 CA197633]
  3. University of California, Los Angeles (CTSI KL2 Award)
  4. Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Career Enhancement Program
  5. Ressler Family Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

'Immune checkpoint blockade' for cancer describes the use of therapeutic antibodies that disrupt negative immune regulatory checkpoints and unleash pre-existing antitumour immune responses. Antibodies targeting the checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and PD1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) have had early success in the clinic, which has led to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of multiple agents in several cancer types. Yet, clinicians still have very limited tools to discriminate a priori patients who will and will not respond to treatment. This has fuelled a wave of research into the molecular mechanisms of tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, leading to the rediscovery of biological processes critical to antitumour immunity, namely interferon signalling and antigen presentation. Other efforts have shed light on the immunological implications of canonical cancer signalling pathways, such as WNT-beta-catenin signalling, cell cycle regulatory signalling, mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling and pathways activated by loss of the tumour suppressor phosphoinositide phosphatase PTEN. Here we review each of these molecular mechanisms of resistance and explore ongoing approaches to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade and expand the spectrum of patients who can benefit from immune checkpoint blockade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available