4.5 Article

Protofibril assemblies of the arctic, dutch, and flemish mutants of the Alzheimer's Aβ1-40 peptide

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 2007-2016

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.121467

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM 070919, R01 GM070919, R01 GM070919-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a coarse-grained model of the A beta peptide, we analyze the Arctic (E22G), Dutch (E22Q), and Flemish (A21G) familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) mutants for any changes in the stability of amyloid assemblies with respect to the wild-type (WT) sequence. Based on a structural reference state of two protofilaments aligned to create the agitated protofibril as determined by solid-state NMR, we determine free energy trends for A beta assemblies for the WT and FAD familial sequences. We find that the structural characteristics and oligomer size of the critical nucleus vary dramatically among the hereditary mutants. The Arctic mutant's disorder in the turn region introduces new stabilizing interactions that better align the two protofilaments, yielding a well-defined protofibril axis at relatively small oligomer sizes with respect to WT. By contrast, the critical nucleus for the Flemish mutant is beyond the 20 chains characterized in this study, thereby showing a strong shift in the equilibrium toward monomers with respect to larger protofibril assemblies. The Dutch mutant forms more ordered protofilaments than WT, but exhibits greater disorder in protofibril structure that includes an alternative polymorph of the WT fibril. An important conclusion of this work is that the Dutch mutant does not support the agitated protofibril assembly. We discuss the implications of the structural ensembles and free energy profiles for the FAD mutants in regards to interpretation of the kinetics of fibril assembly using chromatography and dye-binding experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available