4.2 Article

Using Latent Class Analysis to Support theICD-11Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Diagnosis in a Sample of Homeless Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 677-687

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jts.22554

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sacred Heart Mission
  2. VincentCare
  3. Inner South Community Health
  4. MIND
  5. Helen Macpherson Smith Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 11th revision of theInternational Classification of Diseases(ICD-11), ratified at the World Health Assembly in May 2019, introduced revised diagnostic guidelines for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as well as a separate diagnosis of complex PTSD (CPTSD). We aimed to test the newICD-11symptom structure for PTSD and CPTSD in a sample of individuals who have experienced homelessness. Experiences of trauma exposure and the associated mental health outcomes have been underresearched in this population. A sample of adults experiencing homelessness (N= 206) completed structured and semi-structured interviews that collected information about trauma exposure and symptoms of PTSD and CPTSD. We conducted a latent class analysis (LCA) using six symptom clusters (three PTSD symptom clusters that are components of CPTSD and three CPTSD symptom clusters). All participants reported trauma exposure, with 88.6% having experienced at least one event before 16 years of age. Four distinct classes of participants emerged in relation to the potential to meet the diagnosis: LCA CPTSD (n= 122, 59.8%), LCA no diagnosis (n= 27: 13.2%), LCA PTSD (n= 33; 16.2%), and LCA disturbance in self-organization (DSO;n= 22; 10.8%). Of note, participants with anICD-11CPTSD as well as those with anICD-11PTSD diagnosis fell into the LCA CPTSD class. Our findings provide some support for the distinction between CPTSD and PTSD within this population specifically but potentially have broader implications. Clear diagnoses will allow targeted PTSD and CPTSD treatment development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available