4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

How to Treat Multifocal Ta High-grade Disease if Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Is Unavailable

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 705-709

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.011

Keywords

pTa; Low grade; High grade; Multiple lesions; Cystectomy; Epirubicin; Gemcitabine; Chemohyperthermia

Funding

  1. Cepheid(R)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 71-yr-old man was transferred to our institution with multiple and recurrent high-grade pTa bladder cancer 26 mo after an initial presentation of multiple and large pTa low-grade tumors and concomitant carcinoma in situ, treated with transurethral resection plus 6-mo postoperative mitomycin C. This case discusses several treatment options in the absence of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Immediate radical cystectomy is an option with excellent survival, since there is a substantial risk of understaging and disease progression; however, this results in overtreatment in similar to 50% of these patients. Therefore, a conservative approach could be intravesical combination therapy such as gemcitabine/docetaxel or epirubicin/interferon. In addition, device-assisted intravesical therapy is becoming an option to consider. Finally, patients could be included in trials such as immunotherapy trials. Patient summary: This 71-yr-old patient was diagnosed with recurrent, moderately severe noninvasive bladder tumors, which were removed. The recommended additional therapy, intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) instillations, was not available. Both the pros and the cons of radical surgery (bladder removal) and a more conservative approach (other intravesical treatments) are discussed. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available