4.6 Article

A key region of molecular specificity orchestrates unique ephrin-B1 utilization by Cedar virus

Journal

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900578

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/L009528/1, MR/S007555/1]
  2. Academy of Finland [309605]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID]) [AI123449, AI069317, AI115226]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH [F31-AI133943]
  5. Host-Pathogens Interactions Training Grant at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [T32-AI007647-16]
  6. Wellcome Centre grant [203141/Z/16/Z]
  7. Office of the Director of the NIH
  8. MRC [MR/S007555/1, MR/L009528/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emergent zoonotic henipaviruses, Hendra, and Nipah are responsible for frequent and fatal disease outbreaks in domestic animals and humans. Specificity of henipavirus attachment glycoproteins (G) for highly species-conserved ephrin ligands underpins their broad host range and is associated with systemic and neurological disease pathologies. Here, we demonstrate that Cedar virus (CedV)-a related henipavirus that is ostensibly nonpathogenic-possesses an idiosyncratic entry receptor repertoire that includes the common henipaviral receptor, ephrin-B2, but, distinct from pathogenic henipaviruses, does not include ephrin-B3. Uniquely among known henipaviruses, CedV can use ephrin-B1 for cellular entry. Structural analyses of CedV-G reveal a key region of molecular specificity that directs ephrin-B1 utilization, while preserving a universal mode of ephrin-B2 recognition. The structural and functional insights presented uncover diversity within the known henipavirus receptor repertoire and suggest that only modest structural changes may be required to modulate receptor specificities within this group of lethal human pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available