4.5 Article

Synthesis, structure analysis, antitumor evaluation and 3D-QSAR studies of 3,6-disubstituted-dihydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazine derivatives

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 6474-6480

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.09.036

Keywords

Tetrazine; X-ray diffraction; Antitumor activity; 3D-QSAR; CoMFA; CoMSIA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20802069]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y2090985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3,6-Diaryl-dihydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazine derivatives were synthesized and their structures were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Monosubstituted dihydrotetrazines are the 1,4-dihydro structure, but disubstituted dihydrotetrazines are the 1,2-dihydro structure. The results of further research indicated there may be a rearrangement during the synthesis process of disubstituted dihydrotetrazines. Their antitumor activities were evaluated against A-549 and P388 cells in vitro. The results showed several compounds to be endowed with cytotoxicity in the low micromolar range. Two compounds were highly effective against A-549 cell and IC50 values were 0.575 and 2.08 mu M, respectively. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) studies of comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) were carried out on 37 1,2,4,5-tetrazine derivatives with antitumor activity against A-549 cell. Models with good predictive abilities were generated with the cross validated q(2) values for CoMFA and CoMSIA being 0.744 and 0.757, respectively. Conventional r(2) values were 0.978 and 0.988, respectively, the predicted R-2 values were 0.916 and 0.898, respectively. The results provide the tool for guiding the design and synthesis of novel and more potent tetrazine derivatives. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available