4.0 Article

EXAMINING THE EFFECT OF AN ONLINE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TOOL (O FAT) OF STUDENTS' MOTIVATION AND ACHIEVEMENT FOR A UNIVERSITY SCIENCE EDUCATION

Journal

JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 401-414

Publisher

SCI METHODICAL CTR-SCI EDUCOLOGICA
DOI: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.401

Keywords

adaptive assignment; formative assessment; teaching/learning methodologies; university science education

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities of Spain [EDU2016-77007-R]
  2. Regional Ministry of Economy, Science and Digital Agenda of Extremadura
  3. European Reginal Development Fund [IB18004, GR18004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Online formative assessment is still challenging although it is getting an increased attention as a significant tool for diagnosing and analysing students' motivation and achievement in various education domains. This research examines the effects of an online formative assessment tool (OFAT) about science motivation and achievement in second-year students' university education during four consecutive academic years, 2014 to 2018. A research on the basis of a randomized experimental design was conducted that assigned groups used an OFAT along with various assessments that students participated. A total of 311 students enrolled in the subject take part in the research, respectively 94, 89, 59 and 71 students. Particularly, the OFAT is offering feedback from students, feedback from lecturers and adaptive assignments. Here, data contained student motivation survey data, standardized achievement pre- and post-test data and students' log records. The results of multiple tier analyses exposed positive effects about students' motivation and achievement. Based on usage measurements, students' intensity offers the positive effects about students' motivation and achievement. Furthermore, along with overall students' improved performance, the effects of high-performing students' achievement were higher. Therefore, the results acquired meaningfully contribute to recover main drawbacks and difficulties of traditional science learning programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available