Journal
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 393-411Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucaa029
Keywords
evolutionary psychology; behavioral immune system; disease cues; typicality
Categories
Funding
- Hong Kong Research Grants Council [GRF 16503115]
- Synergis-Geoffrey Yeh foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines how exposure to disease-related cues influences consumers' preference for typical (vs. atypical) product options. Merging insights from evolutionary psychology with research on preference for typicality in consumer products, we predict that disease salience decreases relative preference for typical versus atypical options, because typical products are implicitly associated with many people, misaligning them with the people-avoidance motive triggered by disease cues. We further build on this conceptualization to identify situations in which this preference shift might be eliminated. Specifically, we argue that the focal effect will not manifest when the disease in question is explicitly described to be noncontagious, or when an anti-infection intervention is introduced, or when the decision context involves minimum infection. Results from six studies provide support for our predictions, advancing basic knowledge on the evolutionary strategies guiding disease avoidance, while also documenting how such strategies can affect consumer preferences.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available