4.2 Article

Dissociation Constants and Solubilities of Dalbergin and Nordalbergin in Different Solvents

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
Volume 60, Issue 9, Pages 2585-2593

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.5b00098

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272448, 81373368]
  2. Innovation Project Plan Program of Shaanxi Province [2011KTCL03-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dissociation constants (pK(a)) of dalbergin and nordalbergin were measured at 298.2 K using ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy method. The solubilities of dalbergin and nordalbergin in water, methanol, propanone, ethyl ethanoate, trichloromethane, and hexane have been determined by the UV spectrophotometric method from 283.2 to 308.2 K at atmospheric pressure. The experimental solubility values were correlated with a modified Apelblat equation, lambda h model, and ideal model. The pKa value of dalbergin is 8.91 +/- 0.12, and the pK(a1) and pK(a2) values of nordalbergin are 7.31 +/- 0.29 and 9.79 +/- 0.39, respectively. The solubilities of dalbergin and nordalbergin in six solvents increase with an increase in temperature. The solubility order of dalbergin in six pure solvents was trichloromethane > propanone > ethyl ethanoate > methanol > hexane > water, whereas that of nordalbergin was propanone > methanol > ethyl ethanoate > trichloromethane > water > hexane. A comparison of the solubility of dalbergin with that of nordalbergin shows that the 7-methoxyl moiety of dalbergin leads to a significantly higher solubility in trichloromethane and hexane, a little higher solubility in ethyl ethanoate, an approximately equal solubility in propanone, and a little lower solubility in methanol and water (exception 283.2 K). For dalbergin, the modified Apelblat equation shows the best correlation for all solvents, and for nordalbergin, correlation results by three models are similar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available