4.0 Review

Review of new flow friction equations: Constructing Colebrook's explicit correlations accurately

Publisher

SCIPEDIA S L
DOI: 10.23967/j.rimni.2020.09.001

Keywords

Colebrook equation; Hydraulic flow friction; Wright omega-function; explicit approximations; symbolic regression; computational intelligence

Funding

  1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate C: Energy, Transport, and Climate, Unit C3: Energy Security, Distribution, and Markets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using only a limited number of computationally expensive functions, we show a way how to construct accurate and computationally efficient approximations of the Colebrook equation for flow friction based on the asymptotic series expansion of the Wright w-function and on symbolic regression. The results are verified with 8 million of Quasi-Monte Carlo points covering the domain of interest for engineers. In comparison with the built-in wrightOmega feature of Matlab R2016a, the herein introduced related approximations of the Wright omega-function significantly accelerate the explicit solution of the Colebrook equation. Such balance between speed and accuracy could be achieved only using symbolic regression, a computational intelligence approach that can find optimal coefficients and the best structure of the equation. The presented numerical experiments show that the novel symbolic regression approximation reduced the maximal relative error from 0.045% to 0.00337%, i.e. more than 13 times, even the complexity remains almost unchanged. Moreover, we also provide a novel highly precise symbolic regression approximation (max. relative error 0.000024%), which, for the same speed as asymptotic expansion, reduces the relative error by factor 219. This research is motivated by estimation of flow rate using electrical parameters of pumps where direct measurement is not always possible such as in offshore underwater pipelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available