4.7 Article

Long-lived light neutralinos at future Z factories

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.115018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Excellent Young Talents Program of the Wuhan University of Technology
  2. CEPC theory Grant of Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP), CAS
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11905162]
  4. Sino-German DFG grant SFB CRC 110 Symmetries and the Emergence of Structure in QCD
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning of Korea
  6. Pohang City Government
  7. Gyeongsangbuk-do Provincial Government through the Young Scientist Training Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation program of Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics (APCTP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future lepton colliders such as the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) and FCC (Future Circular Collider)-ce would run as high-luminosity Z-boson factories, which offer a unique opportunity to study long-lived particles which couple to Z bosons. In order to exemplify this particular advantage, in this work, we consider one benchmark physics scenario where the long-lived lightest neutralinos pair ((chi) over tilde (0)(1)(chi) over tilde (0)(1)) is produced from Z decays in the context of the R-parity -violating supersymmetry. Our analysis indicates that when assuming BR(Z -> (chi) over tilde (0)(1)(chi) over tilde (0)(1)) = 10(-3) and m((chi) over tilde 10) similar to 40 GeV, the model parameter lambda(112)'/m((f) over tilde)(2) can be discovered down to as low as similar to 1.5 x 10(-14) (3.9 x 10(-14)) GeV-2 at the FCC-ee (CEPC) with center-of-mass energy root s = 91.2 GeV and 150 (16) ab(-1) integrated luminosity. These limits exceed the projected sensitivity reaches of the ATLAS experiment at the high-luminosity Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the proposed LHC experiments with far detectors (AL3X, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available