4.5 Article

Structure and property based design, synthesis and biological evaluation of γ-lactam based HDAC inhibitors

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1218-1221

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.079

Keywords

Histone deacetylase; HDAC; Inhibitor; Isoform; Anticancer; In vitro activity; Docking study; ADME

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation [2009-0092966]
  2. Korea Research WCU [R31-2008-000-10086-0]
  3. Brain Korea 21 project, Republic of Korea
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0092966] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are involved in post-translational modification and gene expression. Cancer cells recruited amounts of HDACs for their survival by epi-genetic down regulation of tumor suppressor genes. HDACs have been the promising targets for treatment of cancer, and many HDAC inhibitors have been investigated nowadays. In previous study, we synthesized delta-lactam core HDAC inhibitors which showed potent HDAC inhibitory activities as well as cancer cell growth inhibitory activities. Through QSAR study of the delta-lactam based inhibitors, the smaller core is suggested as more active than larger one because it fits better in narrow hydrophobic tunnel of the active pocket of HDAC enzyme. The smaller gamma-lactam core HDAC inhibitors were designed and synthesized for biological and property optimization. Phenyl, naphthyl and thiophenyl groups were introduced as the cap groups. Hydrophobic and bulky cap groups increase potency of HDAC inhibition because of hydrophobic interaction between HDAC and inhibitors. In overall, gamma-lactam based HDAC inhibitors showed more potent than delta-lactam analogues. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available