4.7 Article

H-0 Reconstruction with Type Ia Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Gravitational Lensing Time Delay

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 900, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba756

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1931202, 11633001, 11690023]
  2. INFN INDARK PD51 grant
  3. ASI-INAF [2017-14-H.0]
  4. ASI [2016-24-H.0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a persistent H-0-tension, now at more than greater than or similar to 4 sigma level, between the local distance ladder value and the Planck cosmic microwave background measurement, in the context of flat Lambda-cold-dark-matter (Lambda CDM) model. We reconstruct H(z) in a cosmological-model-independent way using three low-redshift distance probes including the latest data from baryon acoustic oscillation, supernova Ia (SN Ia) and gravitational lensing time-delay (GLTD) observations. We adopt general parametric models of H(z) and assume a Gaussian sound horizon at drag epoch, r(s), from Planck measurement. The reconstructed Hubble constant H-0,H- rec using Pantheon SN Ia and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) data are consistent with the Planck flat Lambda CDM value. When including the GLTD data, H-0,H- rec increases mildly, yet remains discrepant with the local measurement at similar to 2.2 sigma level. With our reconstructions being blind to the dark sectors at low redshift, we reaffirm the earlier claims that the Hubble tension is not likely to be solved by modifying the energy budget of the low-redshift universe. We further forecast the constraining ability of future realistic mock BAO data from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument and GLTD data from Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, combining which, we anticipate that the uncertainty of H-0,H- rec would be improved by similar to 27%, reaching sigma H-0,H- rec approximate to 0.67 uncertainty level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available