4.6 Article

Quantification of [18F]DPA-714 binding in the human brain: initial studies in healthy controls and Alzheimer's disease patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 766-772

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.261

Keywords

[18F]DPA-714; Alzheimer's disease; neuroinflammation; PET quantification; TSPO

Funding

  1. Bayer Healthcare AG, Berlin, Germany
  2. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2011-278850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluorine-18 labelled N, N-diethyl-2-(2-[4-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl]-5,7-dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-yl) acetamide ([F-18] DPA-714) binds to the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) with high affinity. The aim of this initial methodological study was to develop a plasma input tracer kinetic model for quantification of [F-18] DPA-714 binding in healthy subjects and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and to provide a preliminary assessment whether there is a disease-related signal. Ten AD patients and six healthy subjects underwent a dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) study along with arterial sampling and a scan protocol of 150 minutes after administration of 250 +/- 10 MBq [F-18] DPA-714. The model that provided the best fits to tissue time activity curves (TACs) was selected based on Akaike Information Criterion and F-test. The reversible two tissue compartment plasma input model with blood volume parameter was the preferred model for quantification of [F-18] DPA-714 kinetics, irrespective of scan duration, volume of interest, and underlying volume of distribution (V-T). Simplified reference tissue model (SRTM)-derived binding potential (BPND) using cerebellar gray matter as reference tissue correlated well with plasma input-based distribution volume ratio (DVR). These data suggest that [F-18] DPA-714 cannot be used for separating individual AD patients from heathy subjects, but further studies including TSPO binding status are needed to substantiate these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available