4.5 Article

The genotypic difference in the effect of water stress after anthesis on the malt quality parameters in barley

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 209-214

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.012

Keywords

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L); Cultivar; Malt quality; Water stress; Wild barley

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31330055, 31171544]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-05]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014FZA6011]
  4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production (JCIC-MCP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that water stress is a major abiotic factor causing barley yield loss and unstable malt quality. However it is not quite clear about the altered pattern of the main malt quality traits for the barley genotypes differing in water stress tolerance. In this study, the effect of water stress during grain filling stage on grain weight, beta-glucan content, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase (LD) activities of three Tibetan wild and two cultivated barley genotypes were investigated. The results showed that water stress reduced biomass accumulation and grain weight of all genotypes, and increased protein content, but the reduced or increased extent differed significantly among genotypes, with XZ147 being less affected. In general, water stress increased beta-amylase activity, reduced beta-glucan content, had little effect on LD activity, which are attributed to increased protein and hordein contents, reduced grain weight, and its ineffective form in grains, respectively. Tibetan wild barley XZ147 is characterized by little change in grain weight and beta-glucan content, dramatically increase of beta-amylase activity under water stress, indicating its great potential for use in developing barley cultivars with high tolerance to water stress and high malt quality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available