4.7 Article

Effect of environmental pressure on the microstructure of YSZ thermal barrier coating via suspension plasma spraying

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 535-543

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.8.022

Keywords

Thermal barrier coatings; Suspension plasma spray; Environmental pressure; Coating microstructure

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502600]
  2. Scientific Research Project of Guangdong Academy of Sciences [2020GDASYL-20200103111, 2018GDASCX-0402]
  3. Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou city [202007020008]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201701810083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, YSZ thermal barrier coatings were prepared using suspension plasma spraying under different environmental pressures, and the resulting coatings showed significant changes in structure, surface roughness, nanoparticle agglomeration, and real porosity under lower environmental pressures.
Suspension plasma spraying (SPS) as a potential technique to prepare thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) has been attracting more and more attention. However, most reports on SPS were carried out in the atmosphere. Given the unique features of in-flight particles and plasma jets under low pressure, the resulting coatings are expected to be different from those under atmospheric pressure. In this article, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) thermal barrier coatings were prepared using suspension plasma spraying under different environmental pressures. The results show that as the environmental pressure decreased, the column-like structural coating turned into a vertical crack segmented structure, as well as a dramatic decrease in surface roughness. More nanoparticle agglomerates were formed in the coating under lower environmental pressures. The real porosity of the coating increased with a decrease in environmental pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available