4.7 Review

Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 178-193

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz155

Keywords

microbiome; amplicon sequencing; 16S rRNA sequencing; metagenomics; assembly; functional and taxonomic classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyzing the microbiome using next-generation sequencing techniques has improved our understanding of environmental microorganisms. However, analysis is affected by experimental conditions and downstream analysis, and new sequencing technologies can impact results. This work aims to review important workflows for sequencing data and provide best-practice protocols.
Analyzing the microbiome of diverse species and environments using next-generation sequencing techniques has significantly enhanced our understanding on metabolic, physiological and ecological roles of environmental microorganisms. However, the analysis of the microbiome is affected by experimental conditions (e.g. sequencing errors and genomic repeats) and computationally intensive and cumbersome downstream analysis (e.g. quality control, assembly, binning and statistical analyses). Moreover, the introduction of new sequencing technologies and protocols led to a flood of new methodologies, which also have an immediate effect on the results of the analyses. The aim of this work is to review the most important workflows for 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun and long-read metagenomics, as well as to provide best-practice protocols on experimental design, sample processing, sequencing, assembly, binning, annotation and visualization. To simplify and standardize the computational analysis, we provide a set of best-practice workflows for 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing data (available at https://github.com/grimmlab/MicrobiomeBestPracticeReview).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available