4.7 Article

Coordination of tradable carbon emission permits market and renewable electricity certificates market in China

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105038

Keywords

Tradable carbon emission permits; Renewable electricity certificates; Renewable portfolio standards; Cap and trade; Market coordination; China

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974197, 71774171]
  2. Beijing Social Science Fund [18GLC084]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020MS047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that establishing coordinated carbon emission quotas and renewable energy markets in China will be more economically efficient, and can achieve the dual goals of reducing carbon emissions and promoting renewable energy pursued by the government. Coordinated markets can reduce market risks, maintain lower price levels, and lower consumers' electricity purchase costs.
In order to assist the low-carbon transformation of power sector, China is planning to establish the national Tradable carbon emission permits (TEPs) market and Renewable Electricity Certificates (RECs) market under mandatory carbon caps and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) targets simultaneously. How to coordinate the two markets and what the coordination effects are become key issues. In the present study, a multi-region multi-market equilibrium model considering both mechanisms was developed and applied to China as the case study. The model established the effective coordination interval between RPS targets and carbon caps in which the two markets can operate jointly. Then the coordinated markets were proved to be more economically efficient so long as the government pursues the dual goal of reducing carbon emission and promoting renewable energy in sync. Finally, the theoretical and practical advantages of market coordination compared with uncoupled operation of these markets, such as diversifying markets risk, keeping TEP/REC price at lower level, and reducing consumers' electricity purchase cost, were discussed. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available