4.6 Article

Power to which people? Explaining how electrification targets voters across party rotations in Ghana

Journal

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105391

Keywords

Electrification; Political economy; Voter targeting; Africa; Ghana

Funding

  1. Virginia Tech's College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In countries with low household electrification rates, the allocation of electricity resources is determined by political factors. A study in democratic Ghana over two decades reveals that party rotations significantly influence the location of new electrification projects. Different political parties adopt distinct strategies to target voters, considering the impact of electrification projects on both beneficiaries and informed voters.
In countries with low household electrification rates, who gets electricity is an urgent political question. I examine the location and timing of 3,515 electrification projects in democratic Ghana over two decades, during which time the party in power rotated twice while the fraction of the population with electricity doubled. I show that party rotations cause large shifts in the location of new electrification projects, with each party following a different canonical voter targeting strategy. I propose that the parties choose different strategies because electrification projects can influence not only the voters that receive a transfer, but also voters that merely learn about a transfer. I develop a theory of how such information externalities influence how parties target resources and I show that political elites in Ghana think about resource allocation in ways that are consistent with the existence of information externalities. This analysis thus demonstrates that politics can strongly condition who receives electricity and when they receive it. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available