4.7 Article

Intensive Risk Factor Management and Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes: The ACCORD Trial

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 164-173

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1842

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Iacocca Foundation through a Mary K. Iacocca Fellowship
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK/NIH) [R01 DK107956-01, U01 DK119083]
  3. JDRF Center of Excellence at the University of Michigan
  4. NIDDK/NIH grant (Enrichment Core of the Diabetes Research Center at the Joslin Diabetes Center) [DK36836]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HC-95178, N01-HC-95179, N01-HC-95180, N01-HC-95181, N01-HC-95182, N01-HC-95183, N01-HC-95184, IAA-Y1-HC-9035, IAA-Y1-HC-1010]
  6. NIH
  7. NIDDK
  8. National Institute on Aging
  9. National Eye Institute
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  11. General Clinical Research Centers
  12. NHLBI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study confirmed the benefits of intensive glycemic therapy and for the first time demonstrated a similar benefit of intensive blood pressure control in preventing CAN in T2D patients. Patients with no history of CVD particularly benefit from intensive glycemic control for CAN prevention.
OBJECTIVE The effects of preventive interventions on cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) remain unclear. We examined the effect of intensively treating traditional risk factors for CAN, including hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high cardiovascular risk participating in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CAN was defined as heart rate variability indices below the fifth percentile of the normal distribution. Of 10,251 ACCORD participants, 71% (n = 7,275) had a CAN evaluation at study entry and at least once after randomization. The effects of intensive interventions on CAN were analyzed among these subjects through generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS As compared with standard intervention, intensive glucose treatment reduced CAN risk by 16% (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94, P = 0.003)-an effect driven by individuals without cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85, P < 0.0001) rather than those with CVD (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91-1.34, P = 0.34) (P-interaction = 0.001). Intensive blood pressure (BP) intervention decreased CAN risk by 25% (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001), especially in patients >= 65 years old (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P = 0.005) (P-interaction = 0.05). Fenofibrate did not have a significant effect on CAN (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.07, P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS These data confirm a beneficial effect of intensive glycemic therapy and demonstrate, for the first time, a similar benefit of intensive BP control on CAN in T2D. A negative CVD history identifies T2D patients who especially benefit from intensive glycemic control for CAN prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available