3.8 Article

Prevailing Outcome Themes Reported by People With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Focus Group Study

Journal

JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/18732

Keywords

cervical; myelopathy; spondylosis; spondylotic; stenosis; disc herniation; ossification posterior longitudinal ligament; qualitative; thematic analysis; core outcomes set; consensus; Delphi; patient perspectives

Funding

  1. AO Spine through the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Spinal Cord Injury, a focused group of international spinal cord injury experts
  2. AO Spine Research Department
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinician Scientist Award
  6. NIHR Clinician Scientist Award [NIHR-CS-2017-17-010]
  7. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
  8. University of Bristol
  9. Royal College of Surgeons, London
  10. NIHR [CS-2015-15-023]
  11. AO Spine Knowledge Forum Spinal Cord Injury as part of the AO Spine RECODE-DCM international consensus project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and potentially disabling condition caused by arthritic changes in the cervical spine leading to compression and injury to the spinal cord. Research on DCM faces challenges due to heterogeneous reporting of study data. The RECODE-DCM project aims to improve research efficiency by developing a core outcome set. Through qualitative exploration of patient-reported outcomes, this study identified several unmeasured themes in clinical research or care, providing a unique perspective on the impact of DCM.
Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) arises when arthritic changes of the cervical spine cause compression and a progressive injury to the spinal cord. It is common and potentially disabling. People with DCM have among the lowest quality of life scores (Short Form Health Survey-36 item [SF-36]) of chronic disease, although the drivers of the imapact of DCM are not entirely understood. DCM research faces a number of challenges, including the heterogeneous reporting of study data. The AO Spine Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (RECODE-DCM) project is an international consensus process that aims to improve research efficiency through formation of a core outcome set (COS). A key part of COS development process is organizing outcomes into domains that represent key aspects of the disease. To facilitate this, we sought to qualitatively explore the context and impact of patient-reported outcomes in DCM on study participants. Objective: The goal of the research was to qualitatively explore the patient-reported outcomes in DCM to improve understanding of patient perspective and assist the organization of outcomes into domains for the consensus process. Methods: Focus group sessions were hosted in collaboration with Myelopathy.org, a charity and support group for people with DCM. A 40-minute session was audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Two authors familiarized themselves with the data and then performed data coding independently. Codes were grouped into themes and a thematic analysis was performed guided by Braun and Clarke's 6-phase approach. The themes were subsequently reviewed with an independent stakeholder with DCM, assisting in the process of capturing the true context and importance of themes. Results: Five people with DCM (3 men and 2 women) participated in the focus group session. The median age was 53 years, and the median score on the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale was 11 (interquartile range 9.5-11.5), indicating the participants had moderate to severe DCM. A total of 54 codes were reviewed and grouped into 10 potential themes that captured the impact of the disability on people with DCM: acceptance of symptoms, anticipatory anxiety, coping mechanisms/resilience, feelings of helplessness, financial consequences, lack of recognition, mental health impact, loss of life control, social reclusiveness and isolation, and social stigma. Conclusions: This qualitative analysis of the perspectives of people with DCM has highlighted a number of prevailing themes currently unmeasured in clinical research or care. The determinants of low quality of life in DCM are currently unknown, and these findings provide a novel and so far, unique perspective. Continued inclusion of online communities and use of targeted digital software will be important in establishing a consensus-based COS for patients with DCM that is inclusive of all relevant stakeholders including people with DCM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available